Patra Chawl case: New proof suggests Sajay Raut performed key position in siphoning crime proceeds, says ED chargesheet
Mumbai: New evidences recommend Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut could have performed a vital position in siphoning off proceeds of crime (POC) within the case pertaining to alleged monetary irregularities in a housing challenge in suburban Mumbai, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has claimed in its supplementary charge-sheet.
The ED additionally claimed the Sena chief (60), presently in jail, together with different officers related to the redevelopment of Patra Chawl (chawls are rows of tenements/tiny residences), was current at a gathering referred to as by the then-chief minister in 2007 to debate the monetary implication of the multi-crore challenge.
The anti-money laundering company arrested the Rajya Sabha member on August 1 in reference to alleged monetary irregularities within the redevelopment of Patra Chawl in suburban Goregaon. It had final week filed a supplementary charge-sheet naming Sanjay Raut as an accused within the case.
The ED probe pertains to alleged monetary irregularities within the redevelopment of Patra Chawl and associated property transactions involving his spouse and alleged associates.
Siddharth Nagar, popularly referred to as Patra Chawl, is an space positioned in Goregaon, a northern Mumbai suburb. It housed almost 672 properties unfold over 47 acres of land.
In 2008, the Maharashtra Housing and Improvement Authority (MHDA) handed over the challenge of redeveloping the chawl to Guru Ashish Building Pvt Ltd (GACPL), a sister firm of HDIL (Housing Improvement and Infrastructure Ltd). GACPL was supposed to construct 672 flats for individuals there and residences for state housing company MHDA and promote the remaining land to personal builders for the non-public firm’s personal improvement works.
The corporate neither redeveloped the chawl nor constructed any flats that was to be handed over to MHADA and offered land parcels and the Flooring Area Index (FSI) to different builders for Rs 1,034 crore. GACPL as a substitute launched its personal challenge referred to as ‘The Meadows’ and took reserving quantities totalling Rs 138 crore from flat patrons.
FSI is the utmost space that may be constructed on a plot of land. As an example, if one has 1,000 sq. toes of land on which desires to construct a residential/business constructing and the FSI in that locality is 1.5, then he can construct as much as 1,500 sq ft of coated constructions on the plot.
The ED claimed Pravin Raut, an in depth affiliate of Sanjay Raut, and different administrators of GACPL misled MHADA and in addition the Maharashtra authorities, and offered the FSI to different actual property builders for Rs 901.79 crore and by no means accomplished the challenge they have been handed over.
The central company mentioned although on paper an settlement was executed for the curiosity of three events, solely curiosity of Wadhwans (HDIL promoters Rakesh and Sarang Wadhawan) have been protected because of which generated advantages of round Rs 1,000 crore have been diverted in a scientific method to their group corporations as a substitute of using the identical for the chawl challenge.
On the premise of recent evidences which have surfaced, it seems Sanjay Raut could have additionally performed a significant position together with different accused as a consequence of which POC (proceeds of crime) have been siphoned off as a substitute of utilization of the identical for the tenants and different patrons who had booked their flats with builders and put their hard-earned cash, the ED claimed within the charge-sheet.
Nevertheless, Sanjay Raut advised the ED he had no data concerning the Patra Chawl challenge and got here to learn about it by media studies revealed previously two years.
The Rajya Sabha MP has additionally denied having entered into any monetary or enterprise transaction with Pravin Raut, who as per the probe company, was working as a “entrance man” for the politician.
The Sena chief has claimed he doesn’t know Rakesh Kumar Wadhwan, Sarang Wadhwan (HDIL promoters) and Nippun Thakkar, all accused within the case. The Member of Parliament has mentioned he didn’t have any data concerning the involvement of Pravin Raut within the Patra Chawl redevelopment.
Sanjay Raut has mentioned he was circuitously concerned in any actual property challenge, however his spouse Varsha Raut together with Madhuri Raut, partner of Pravin Raut, had received associted with Avni Building and Auri Infrastructure which meant to develop some buildings, which as per his data, have been speculated to be outdoors Mumbai.
On the restoration of Rs 11 lakh in money from his residence in suburban Bhandup, the Sena chief mentioned it was contributed by Shiv Sena employees for his or her Ayodhya go to within the first week of June 2022.
On international journeys, Sanjay Raut mentioned Swapna Patker, a witness within the case, advised him they have been planning to go to China and Hong Kong.
Sanjay Raut mentioned he had not negotiated with any land homeowners at Kihim village in Alibag taluka for getting their land. Swapna Patker at the moment got here with the concept to construct a lodge or restaurant at Kihim village in Alibaug, a coastal city in adjoining Raigad district, he has advised the central company.
Sanjay Raut’s lawyer Vikrant Sabne mentioned, In view of the charge-sheet, the ED ought to reply that if (Sena MLA) Pratap Sarnaik has been discharged on the premise of studies filed by the prosecution within the principal offence, then within the judicial order of March 21, 2020, the same endeavor was given by the prosecution in Patra Chawl case in favour of Pravin Raut and on the premise that Pravin was launched on bail.”
“This order just isn’t but challenged, then the query arises if Sarnaik has been discharged why comparable reduction shouldn’t be granted to (Sanjay) Raut as equality earlier than regulation is the premise of our judicial system,” the lawyer added.
The chief metropolitan Justice of the Peace’s court docket had on Wednesday final accepted the closure report filed by the Mumbai police’s Financial Offences Wing (EOW) in a case in opposition to Topsgrup Providers and Answer Ltd. It was this case, based mostly on which, the ED had lodged a cash laundering case agianst Sarnaik.
In the meantime, the daughter of a property proprietor in Alibag, in her assertion to the ED, has claimed her father had bought 1 acre of land in 1995 and constructed a bungalow and in the remaining, he had made roughly 16 plots.
Her father offered 7 to eight plots to some individuals and the remaining plots have been forcibly acquired by Sanjay Raut, she advised the company.
The witness additional mentioned her father had no intention to promote the land in Kihim (in Alibag), nevertheless it was offered as a consequence of threatening calls obtained from employees of Sanjay Raut.